Home page > Essay sample library > Essay list > Argument From Religious Experience

Argument From Religious Experience

The argument against showing religious experience from religious experience is that personal religious experience can prove that God exists among those who own them. Because people can only see things that exist, some people have experienced him, so God must exist. Although religious experience itself can only constitute direct evidence of the existence of God, for lucky people this experience proves to be indirect evidence of the existence of God. The same can be said to people. .

Discussion of religious experience is an argument from the experience of God to the existence of God. This argument asserts in a powerful way that only experiences of existence are possible and that phenomena of religious experience can prove the existence of God. Because people experience God, they must possess God; the case is closed. In a weaker form, this argument only claims that religious experience constitutes evidence of the existence of God. Richard Swinburn defends this form of argument and proposes credibility principles

Discussion of religious experience is that individual religious experiences can prove that God exists in the discussion of people who own them. Because people can only see things that exist, some people have experienced him, so God must exist. Although religious experience itself can only constitute direct evidence of the existence of God, for lucky people this experience proves to be indirect evidence of the existence of God. The same can be said to people.

The obvious fact about the existence of God is that some people claim to have experienced God. It is these religious experiences being used by philosophers to discuss the existence of God. - The following documents provide the rationale for the existence of God. By proving that the world of atheists can not explain the prerequisites of the laws of logic, atheists can not even explain reasonable arguments about the existence of God. "Opposed impossibility" is the best and only evidence of the necessary truth of the existence of God, enabling God's revelation to us to use logic to us. This can be transformed into the following form using only the required truth. L: (the law of logic) G: (if God exists) if L requires GL ============== G logic is "based on God" rule of reasoning "